In February of 1839, Portuguese slave hunters
abducted a large group of Africans from Sierra Leone and shipped them to
Havana, Cuba, a center for the slave trade. This abduction violated all of the
treaties then in existence. Fifty-three Africans were purchased by two Spanish
planters and put aboard the Cuban schooner Amistad for shipment to a
Caribbean plantation. On July 1, 1839, the Africans seized the ship, killed the
captain and the cook, and ordered the planters to sail to Africa. On August 24,
1839, the Amistad was seized off Long Island, NY, by the U.S. brig Washington.
The planters were freed and the Africans were imprisoned in New Haven, CT, on
charges of murder. Although the murder charges were dismissed, the Africans continued
to be held in confinement as the focus of the case turned to salvage claims and
property rights. President Van Buren was in favor of extraditing the Africans
to Cuba. However, abolitionists in the North opposed extradition and raised
money to defend the Africans. Claims to the Africans by the planters, the
government of Spain, and the captain of the brig led the case to trial in the
Federal District Court in Connecticut. The court ruled that the case fell
within Federal jurisdiction and that the claims to the Africans as property
were not legitimate because they were illegally held as slaves. The case went
to the Supreme Court in January 1841, and former President John Quincy Adams
argued the defendants' case. Adams defended the right of the accused to fight
to regain their freedom. The Supreme Court decided in favor of the Africans,
and 35 of them were returned to their homeland. The others died at sea or in
prison while awaiting trial.
A case before the Circuit Court in Hartford, Connecticut, was filed (September 1839). Slavery was still legal in Connecticut, although not widespread. The Africans were charged with mutiny and murder. The court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction, because the alleged acts occurred on a Spanish-flag ship in Spanish waters as Cuba was a Soanush colony. This began the complicated legal process. Various parties filed property claims the captives, the ship, and the cargo. The British entered the picture because they had a treaty with Spain and argued that the Amjistad Afrucabs should be set free, n eliminating the slave trade so The Van Buren Administration mindful of the need to carry the Southern states in the up coming 1840 election attempted to return the Africans to Cuba. The issue became more complicated when it was discovered that they were not Cubans, but Africans. While slavery itself was legal in the United States and Cuba, the slave trade was illegal. This thus called into question the status as slaves. The ensuing court proceedings and diplomatic maneuverings that resulted energized the fledgling abolitionist movement in the United States. Former president John Quincey Adams took up the cause of defending the Africans. The First Congregational Church, Thomaston, Connecticut raised money for the Amistad captives (1840). Both the Cuban buyers and Queen Queen Isabella II of Spain claimed ownership. The case eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court as United States v. Libellants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad, commonly cited as U.S. v Amistad (1841). The high court ruled that the Africans had been illegally transported and held as slaves, and ordered them freed.
Had this not been decided as was would have affected and been an unconstitutional act because the time of slavery had been over since 1808 which meant that transporting slaves was illegal and against the law. If this case had no been decided this way it would have also continued this transportation of slaves which meant the continuation of such acts. As a result if anyone would intend to prohibit this act it would have been a lot worse because now the plantation owners could defend themselves if they let it happen once there would never b no end it this chain. As for the rich plantation owners if this case would have been decided this way this meant more slaves, more land, more money. Fortunately, it was decided otherwise, and prevented any more scandal than what was already created.
No comments:
Post a Comment